""

Search This Blog

Monday, December 28, 2015

Human Radiation Experiments In Bridgeton MO just like CincinnatiOH



Are the People and Public who are being exposed to the Nuclear Radiation in Bridgeton MO part of a Human Experiment just like what happened in Cincinnati OH long ago?  
The similarities sound eerily familiar the first one is being poor.  The second one is how the area residents are treated ie: Ferguson.  Too many similarities for me not to connect the Dots.  

Cincinnati Radiation Experiment

 Cancer patients (mostly Negroes of below-average intelligence who were charity patients) during 1960-72 in Cincinnati were exposed to large doses of whole body radiation as part of an experiment sponsored by the U.S. military.



Cincinnati radiation experiments

August 30, 2011


Cancer patients (mostly Negroes of below-average intelligence who were charity patients) during 1960-72 in Cincinnati were exposed to large doses of whole body radiation as part of an experiment sponsored by the U.S. military. None of the subjects gave informed consent, they thought they were receiving treatment for their cancer. Subjects experienced nausea and vomiting from acute radiation sickness, pain from burns on their bodies, and some died prematurely as result of radiation exposure. In re Cincinnati Radiation Litigation, 874 F.Supp. 796 (S.D.Ohio 1995). On 5 May 1999, a settlement was announced in which the defendants paid US$ 5.4×106, but defendants admitted no wrongdoing.
government-sponsored – “…What happened here is one of the worst things this government has ever done to its citizens in secret,” Dr. Egilman said. Martha Stephens, now an emeritus professor of English at the University of Cincinnati, helped bring the research to light in the early 1970s and wrote a book about it. She said documents showed that many of the patients had received radiation doses that reduced their white blood cell counts to nearly nothing. At one time, Dr. Saenger said the deaths of eight patients had been caused by radiation, but later he said that none had been caused by it. In 1994, when government-sponsored radiation experiments that had been conducted during the cold war attracted renewed attention, the Cincinnati study came under new scrutiny, and a graduate student working with Professor Stephens began tracking down the families of the patients…” (Eugene Saenger,Controversial Doctor, Dies at 90)
the effect full-body radiation exposure – “…Dr. Stephens began pestering administrators at the medical school for information about the radiation experiments. The more she learned, the more frightened she became. The more frightened, the more she dug. She spent much of 1971 and 1972 digging. She discovered the aim of the secret study was to determine the effect full-body radiation exposure, such as from a nuclear blast, would have on soldiers in combat. But the cancer patients who were subjected to the experiment were not told they were being exposed to deadly doses of radiation. Their doctors told them they were being treated to relieve the pain of their cancers. “As a person teaching at a public university, I wanted to earn my pay. I felt the citizens of the state who were paying my salary wanted me to defend their interest against what was happening on my campus,” she says. “If Ohio citizens were being abused on my campus, I needed to make it known and not wait for outsiders to tell us we were not treating people right…” (Book revisits UC radiation experiments).
consent forms – “…Throughout most of the study, consent forms were not signed. Later, when consent forms were used, many victims claimed they had been duped or had their signatures forged. According to a report by a University of Cincinnati Faculty Committee sent to the Pentagon, “physicians, nurses, technicians, and ward personnel were instructed not to discuss post-irradiation symptoms or reactions with the patients” which included “the risk of death from bone marrow failure within 40 days.” The “treatment” received by UC “patients” is hardly an anomaly. Radiation research was systematic and widespread; the implications well discussed and understood. In fact the national security archives now has reams of declassified documents on various human radiation experiments often conducted on unwitting subjects by numerous government departments. Nor were the doctors involved unclear as to what they were doing. In the 1950s, Shields Warren, then director of the Atomic Energy Commission’s Division of Biology and Medicine, received a memo from Joseph Hamilton— the scientist in charge of radiation experiments at the University of California— advising that large primates be used instead of humans in the upcoming studies on radiation’s cognitive effects, of which Dr. Saenger’s study was one. The memo explained that the use of humans could leave the AEC open “to considerable criticism,” as the experiments had “a little of the Buchenwald touch.” Disregarding this advice, the experiments continued as planned, coast-to-coast, with varying degrees of deadliness. In the early 1980s Dr. David Egilman and Geoffrey Sea— health consultants for the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Union and the Federal Atomic Traders and Labor Council— investigated experiments conducted on nuclear workers and uncovered more crimes committed by the University of Cincinnati hospital. This time it was “body snatching…” (American Mengele: Human Radiation Experiments)
Human radiation experiments – Since the discovery of ionizing radiation, a number of human radiation experiments have been performed to understand the effects of ionizing radiation and radioactive contamination on the human body, specifically with the element plutonium. On January 15, 1994, President Bill Clinton formed the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), chaired by Ruth Faden of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. The committee was created to investigate and report the use of human beings as test subjects in experiments involving the effects of ionizing radiation in federally funded research. The committee discovered the causes of the experiments, and reasons why the proper oversight did not exist, and made several recommendations to prevent future occurrences of similar events (Wikepedia).
RELATED READING:



StLouis Year in review: 2015 local news headlines : News

Year in review: 2015 local news headlines : News





LANDFILL SMOLDERS, TENSION GROWs

In 1973, a hauler dumped radioactive waste in a landfill in Bridgeton. Five years ago, an underground fire was discovered in a neighboring waste dump. Keeping fire and nuclear waste separate is a goal everyone agrees upon.
Just how to do that is a question that lingers with the foul odor. Republic Services of Phoenix, which bought the landfills in 2008, prefers capping the smoldering Bridgeton Landfill and installing a firebreak barrier to West Lake Landfill, which holds low-level waste from work in St. Louis on America’s first nuclear bombs. Activists and neighbors want the material hauled away, a much more expensive proposition.
In September, Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster, the likely Democratic nominee for governor next year, reported the fire getting closer. That contradicted Republic, against which Koster has a lawsuit. KMOX radio disclosed a St. Louis County evacuation plan for the area, and four area school districts sent letters to parents outlining emergency plans.
More than 500 people showed up at a community meeting. “I’m 16 and I’m already worried about my future,” said a sophomore from Pattonville High School, which is located 2 miles away. A brush-fire call at West Lake Landfill added to tension.
Koster later called it a “relief” that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found the situation poses no exposure risk. The EPA plans to choose a solution in 2016.

Scotty Writes: 
Will the EPA and those in charge of the situation acknowledge their own Phytoremediation studies 
that Phytoremediation by Phytoextraction is  not only a cost saving alternative but a logical solution as it can be financed by the plants grown? see>




Image Via Facebook Westlake Landfill Group

The Westlake Landfill group has been formed by concerned residents to inform and keep the public updated about the radioactive waste in the West Lake Landfill in Bridgeton, Mo

https://www.facebook.com/groups/508327822519437/


EPA Phytoremediation Project Considerations



EPAs Economic Considerations
Phytoremediation projects
Phytoremediation projects



To be utilized for the Bridgeton Landfill Phytoremediation Project



Design Cost
  • Site Characterization 
  • Work Plan and Report
  • Treatability and Pilot Testing
Installation Costs 

     Site Preparation
  • Facilities Removal
  • Debris Removal
  • Utility Line Relocation or Removal
     Soil Preparation
  • Physical Modification: Tiling
  • Chelating Agents
  • pH control
  • Drainage
    Infrastructure
  • Irrigation
  • Fencing
    Planting
  • Seeds, Plants
  • Labor
  • Protection
    Operating Costs

    Maintenance

  • Irrigation Water
  • Fertilizer
  • pH Control
  • Chelating Agent
  • Drainage Water Disposal
  • Pesticides
  • Fencing/Pest Control
  • Replanting
  Monitoring
  • Soil Nutrients
  • Soil pH
  • Soil water
  • Plant Nutrient Status
  • Plant Contaminant Status-Roots, Shoots, Stems, Leaves
  • Tree Sap Flow Monitoring
  • Air Monitoring (leaves, branches, whole tree, area)
  • Weather Monitoring

Thursday, December 24, 2015

Investor Business Partner Adviser Update


Dear Future Investors, Business Partners, and Advisers,




I'm glad you came by the mohempenergyblog.  To be clear the proposed business 
MOhemp Energy has discovered new avenues for generating income that will protect your investment, in the short and long term. 

The new proposed avenues to generate income will come from MOhemp Energy Non Profit Hazmat Division as well as growing Medical Cannabis Division to supply the undeserved markets of the growing Medical Marijuana Industry and their needed to serve patients a healthy and proven alternative to taking a pill

Map Bridgeton Landfill Radioactive Soil Manhattan Project EPA neglected location
Bridgeton Landfill Contaminated Radioactive Soil Map Location
The greatest potential to help people avoid the health hazards caused by nuclear radiation from the Nuclear Waste that were deposited in the Bridgeton Landfill of the St Louis region during the Manhattan Project (as mentioned in the Rolling Stone- St Louis is Burning) will come from the natural and most affordable way of removing soil contaminants using Green Remediation

 Epa Study Green Remediation by Phytoextraction affordable proven technology
Phytoextraction is the affordable way to remove soil contaminants

Phytoextraction using phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Such as the Bridgeton Landfill and Cold Water Creek areas of the St Louis Region.

This what sustainability is all about.  

Not only are the plants beneficial in removing the heavy metals from the soil.  They can also be a source for sustainable biomass energy.  For me this is the best of both worlds: Healing the Soil and Creating Sustainable Non Polluting Energy.  see Hemp for Income and Soil Remediation of Nuclear Waste in Bridgeton Missouri and the Cold Water Creek area of the St. Louis Region


I will be the first to admit- I do not have all the answers needed.  That is why 

I am requesting Business Partners who are knowledgeable or who have connections in dealing with Nuclear Radiation.

From all the complex scientific studies I've discovered and read.  I do not feel I will have any trouble getting an Industrial Hemp or Kenaf Plant to grow on this radioactive soil.   This process is being used currently in The Chernobyl phytoremediation project of the Soviet Union as well as bordering area in Ukraine who touts its biomass as the preferred remedy, has been studied for a much needed solution at Fukishima, and with some of the latest information coming out of my favorite hemp organizations Hemp Technologies Nuclear Waste and Hemp and the Decontamination of Radioactive Soil-
For over a decade, industrial hemp growing in the environs of the abandoned Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Pripyat, Ukraine has been helping to reduce soil toxicity.

All of the above endeavors are awesome but its MOhemp Energys way of removing Lignin from the Hemp plant that is my personal favorite.  In addition to the energy and tree saving ability to utilize Hempcrete in a Post Frame Building Design that not only saves energy but saves the resources mankind needs for the generation of oxygen- TREES.  Because without trees and plants creating oxygen and removing carbon dioxide for and from the air.  Mankind faces a very dim future.

Its for all the aforementioned income producing endeavors of MOhemp Energy sends out this invitation to the World, to join in these much needed endeavors.  We can make some money, help people and the planet at the same time!





Wednesday, December 23, 2015

You Do Not Need to be an Expert to Innovate




I just shared this LinkedIn post by D.Jacobs with a leader in the American and Colorado Hemp Industry who seemed reluctant to believe that my invention is the Holy Grail that my EU Hemp Adviser claims it to be.

update added: 1/3/16 The next day after sending this in an email he did reply back and I have been referred to 2 additional Midwest Hemp companies.

To All the Inventors out there who are searching for believers and founders of your great products please remember: 

You Don't Need to be an Expert to Innovate in Your Field

In all four of the companies I founded, I was far from being an expert when I began: in fact, I had never spent a formal day in that field before I had the idea for the company. In all cases, it helped me. Here's a step-by-step guide to why:


1. Innovation is About Solving Big Programs. Across the board, great innovations are also solutions to big problems that many people have tried to solve, but that have left those same people scrambling for answers.


2. Big Problems Aren't Often Solved By Existing Experts. Oftentimes, the old guard in an industry has been doing things one way for so long that they've put on blinders that prevent them from seeing new possibilities.


3. Existing Experts Can Be Part of the Problem. Especially in bleeding industries, experts can be more concerned with maintaining the status quo that won them their expert status... rather than innovating.


4. It Takes a New Pair of Eyes to Spot the Pain. My brother finally helped me see that purple parachute pants in the mid-90s weren't a good idea. Similarly, in business it's often the guy on the outside that sees the problem.


5. Experts Won't Risk Their Expert Status to Find a Solution. That job goes to someone whose risk-reward ratio is different; someone who stands to gain more than they might lose by innovating.


That someone is often a newbie - a person looking at the problem with a fresh pair of eyes. That someone... is perhaps you!


Last Thought: The above is more the cycle of innovation than a story of experts having bad intentions (which isn't usually the case). Marching forward and solving big problems always requires new voices in the conversation.

Posted originally by on Linked In.

Founder and CEO, Avanoo






Share This

Organization and Social Sites