""

Search This Blog

Monday, December 28, 2015

Human Radiation Experiments In Bridgeton MO just like CincinnatiOH



Are the People and Public who are being exposed to the Nuclear Radiation in Bridgeton MO part of a Human Experiment just like what happened in Cincinnati OH long ago?  
The similarities sound eerily familiar the first one is being poor.  The second one is how the area residents are treated ie: Ferguson.  Too many similarities for me not to connect the Dots.  

Cincinnati Radiation Experiment

 Cancer patients (mostly Negroes of below-average intelligence who were charity patients) during 1960-72 in Cincinnati were exposed to large doses of whole body radiation as part of an experiment sponsored by the U.S. military.



Cincinnati radiation experiments

August 30, 2011


Cancer patients (mostly Negroes of below-average intelligence who were charity patients) during 1960-72 in Cincinnati were exposed to large doses of whole body radiation as part of an experiment sponsored by the U.S. military. None of the subjects gave informed consent, they thought they were receiving treatment for their cancer. Subjects experienced nausea and vomiting from acute radiation sickness, pain from burns on their bodies, and some died prematurely as result of radiation exposure. In re Cincinnati Radiation Litigation, 874 F.Supp. 796 (S.D.Ohio 1995). On 5 May 1999, a settlement was announced in which the defendants paid US$ 5.4×106, but defendants admitted no wrongdoing.
government-sponsored – “…What happened here is one of the worst things this government has ever done to its citizens in secret,” Dr. Egilman said. Martha Stephens, now an emeritus professor of English at the University of Cincinnati, helped bring the research to light in the early 1970s and wrote a book about it. She said documents showed that many of the patients had received radiation doses that reduced their white blood cell counts to nearly nothing. At one time, Dr. Saenger said the deaths of eight patients had been caused by radiation, but later he said that none had been caused by it. In 1994, when government-sponsored radiation experiments that had been conducted during the cold war attracted renewed attention, the Cincinnati study came under new scrutiny, and a graduate student working with Professor Stephens began tracking down the families of the patients…” (Eugene Saenger,Controversial Doctor, Dies at 90)
the effect full-body radiation exposure – “…Dr. Stephens began pestering administrators at the medical school for information about the radiation experiments. The more she learned, the more frightened she became. The more frightened, the more she dug. She spent much of 1971 and 1972 digging. She discovered the aim of the secret study was to determine the effect full-body radiation exposure, such as from a nuclear blast, would have on soldiers in combat. But the cancer patients who were subjected to the experiment were not told they were being exposed to deadly doses of radiation. Their doctors told them they were being treated to relieve the pain of their cancers. “As a person teaching at a public university, I wanted to earn my pay. I felt the citizens of the state who were paying my salary wanted me to defend their interest against what was happening on my campus,” she says. “If Ohio citizens were being abused on my campus, I needed to make it known and not wait for outsiders to tell us we were not treating people right…” (Book revisits UC radiation experiments).
consent forms – “…Throughout most of the study, consent forms were not signed. Later, when consent forms were used, many victims claimed they had been duped or had their signatures forged. According to a report by a University of Cincinnati Faculty Committee sent to the Pentagon, “physicians, nurses, technicians, and ward personnel were instructed not to discuss post-irradiation symptoms or reactions with the patients” which included “the risk of death from bone marrow failure within 40 days.” The “treatment” received by UC “patients” is hardly an anomaly. Radiation research was systematic and widespread; the implications well discussed and understood. In fact the national security archives now has reams of declassified documents on various human radiation experiments often conducted on unwitting subjects by numerous government departments. Nor were the doctors involved unclear as to what they were doing. In the 1950s, Shields Warren, then director of the Atomic Energy Commission’s Division of Biology and Medicine, received a memo from Joseph Hamilton— the scientist in charge of radiation experiments at the University of California— advising that large primates be used instead of humans in the upcoming studies on radiation’s cognitive effects, of which Dr. Saenger’s study was one. The memo explained that the use of humans could leave the AEC open “to considerable criticism,” as the experiments had “a little of the Buchenwald touch.” Disregarding this advice, the experiments continued as planned, coast-to-coast, with varying degrees of deadliness. In the early 1980s Dr. David Egilman and Geoffrey Sea— health consultants for the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Union and the Federal Atomic Traders and Labor Council— investigated experiments conducted on nuclear workers and uncovered more crimes committed by the University of Cincinnati hospital. This time it was “body snatching…” (American Mengele: Human Radiation Experiments)
Human radiation experiments – Since the discovery of ionizing radiation, a number of human radiation experiments have been performed to understand the effects of ionizing radiation and radioactive contamination on the human body, specifically with the element plutonium. On January 15, 1994, President Bill Clinton formed the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), chaired by Ruth Faden of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics. The committee was created to investigate and report the use of human beings as test subjects in experiments involving the effects of ionizing radiation in federally funded research. The committee discovered the causes of the experiments, and reasons why the proper oversight did not exist, and made several recommendations to prevent future occurrences of similar events (Wikepedia).
RELATED READING:



StLouis Year in review: 2015 local news headlines : News

Year in review: 2015 local news headlines : News





LANDFILL SMOLDERS, TENSION GROWs

In 1973, a hauler dumped radioactive waste in a landfill in Bridgeton. Five years ago, an underground fire was discovered in a neighboring waste dump. Keeping fire and nuclear waste separate is a goal everyone agrees upon.
Just how to do that is a question that lingers with the foul odor. Republic Services of Phoenix, which bought the landfills in 2008, prefers capping the smoldering Bridgeton Landfill and installing a firebreak barrier to West Lake Landfill, which holds low-level waste from work in St. Louis on America’s first nuclear bombs. Activists and neighbors want the material hauled away, a much more expensive proposition.
In September, Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster, the likely Democratic nominee for governor next year, reported the fire getting closer. That contradicted Republic, against which Koster has a lawsuit. KMOX radio disclosed a St. Louis County evacuation plan for the area, and four area school districts sent letters to parents outlining emergency plans.
More than 500 people showed up at a community meeting. “I’m 16 and I’m already worried about my future,” said a sophomore from Pattonville High School, which is located 2 miles away. A brush-fire call at West Lake Landfill added to tension.
Koster later called it a “relief” that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found the situation poses no exposure risk. The EPA plans to choose a solution in 2016.

Scotty Writes: 
Will the EPA and those in charge of the situation acknowledge their own Phytoremediation studies 
that Phytoremediation by Phytoextraction is  not only a cost saving alternative but a logical solution as it can be financed by the plants grown? see>




Image Via Facebook Westlake Landfill Group

The Westlake Landfill group has been formed by concerned residents to inform and keep the public updated about the radioactive waste in the West Lake Landfill in Bridgeton, Mo

https://www.facebook.com/groups/508327822519437/


EPA Phytoremediation Project Considerations



EPAs Economic Considerations
Phytoremediation projects
Phytoremediation projects



To be utilized for the Bridgeton Landfill Phytoremediation Project



Design Cost
  • Site Characterization 
  • Work Plan and Report
  • Treatability and Pilot Testing
Installation Costs 

     Site Preparation
  • Facilities Removal
  • Debris Removal
  • Utility Line Relocation or Removal
     Soil Preparation
  • Physical Modification: Tiling
  • Chelating Agents
  • pH control
  • Drainage
    Infrastructure
  • Irrigation
  • Fencing
    Planting
  • Seeds, Plants
  • Labor
  • Protection
    Operating Costs

    Maintenance

  • Irrigation Water
  • Fertilizer
  • pH Control
  • Chelating Agent
  • Drainage Water Disposal
  • Pesticides
  • Fencing/Pest Control
  • Replanting
  Monitoring
  • Soil Nutrients
  • Soil pH
  • Soil water
  • Plant Nutrient Status
  • Plant Contaminant Status-Roots, Shoots, Stems, Leaves
  • Tree Sap Flow Monitoring
  • Air Monitoring (leaves, branches, whole tree, area)
  • Weather Monitoring

Thursday, December 24, 2015

Investor Business Partner Adviser Update


Dear Future Investors, Business Partners, and Advisers,




I'm glad you came by the mohempenergyblog.  To be clear the proposed business 
MOhemp Energy has discovered new avenues for generating income that will protect your investment, in the short and long term. 

The new proposed avenues to generate income will come from MOhemp Energy Non Profit Hazmat Division as well as growing Medical Cannabis Division to supply the undeserved markets of the growing Medical Marijuana Industry and their needed to serve patients a healthy and proven alternative to taking a pill

Map Bridgeton Landfill Radioactive Soil Manhattan Project EPA neglected location
Bridgeton Landfill Contaminated Radioactive Soil Map Location
The greatest potential to help people avoid the health hazards caused by nuclear radiation from the Nuclear Waste that were deposited in the Bridgeton Landfill of the St Louis region during the Manhattan Project (as mentioned in the Rolling Stone- St Louis is Burning) will come from the natural and most affordable way of removing soil contaminants using Green Remediation

 Epa Study Green Remediation by Phytoextraction affordable proven technology
Phytoextraction is the affordable way to remove soil contaminants

Phytoextraction using phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Such as the Bridgeton Landfill and Cold Water Creek areas of the St Louis Region.

This what sustainability is all about.  

Not only are the plants beneficial in removing the heavy metals from the soil.  They can also be a source for sustainable biomass energy.  For me this is the best of both worlds: Healing the Soil and Creating Sustainable Non Polluting Energy.  see Hemp for Income and Soil Remediation of Nuclear Waste in Bridgeton Missouri and the Cold Water Creek area of the St. Louis Region


I will be the first to admit- I do not have all the answers needed.  That is why 

I am requesting Business Partners who are knowledgeable or who have connections in dealing with Nuclear Radiation.

From all the complex scientific studies I've discovered and read.  I do not feel I will have any trouble getting an Industrial Hemp or Kenaf Plant to grow on this radioactive soil.   This process is being used currently in The Chernobyl phytoremediation project of the Soviet Union as well as bordering area in Ukraine who touts its biomass as the preferred remedy, has been studied for a much needed solution at Fukishima, and with some of the latest information coming out of my favorite hemp organizations Hemp Technologies Nuclear Waste and Hemp and the Decontamination of Radioactive Soil-
For over a decade, industrial hemp growing in the environs of the abandoned Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Pripyat, Ukraine has been helping to reduce soil toxicity.

All of the above endeavors are awesome but its MOhemp Energys way of removing Lignin from the Hemp plant that is my personal favorite.  In addition to the energy and tree saving ability to utilize Hempcrete in a Post Frame Building Design that not only saves energy but saves the resources mankind needs for the generation of oxygen- TREES.  Because without trees and plants creating oxygen and removing carbon dioxide for and from the air.  Mankind faces a very dim future.

Its for all the aforementioned income producing endeavors of MOhemp Energy sends out this invitation to the World, to join in these much needed endeavors.  We can make some money, help people and the planet at the same time!





Wednesday, December 23, 2015

You Do Not Need to be an Expert to Innovate




I just shared this LinkedIn post by D.Jacobs with a leader in the American and Colorado Hemp Industry who seemed reluctant to believe that my invention is the Holy Grail that my EU Hemp Adviser claims it to be.

update added: 1/3/16 The next day after sending this in an email he did reply back and I have been referred to 2 additional Midwest Hemp companies.

To All the Inventors out there who are searching for believers and founders of your great products please remember: 

You Don't Need to be an Expert to Innovate in Your Field

In all four of the companies I founded, I was far from being an expert when I began: in fact, I had never spent a formal day in that field before I had the idea for the company. In all cases, it helped me. Here's a step-by-step guide to why:


1. Innovation is About Solving Big Programs. Across the board, great innovations are also solutions to big problems that many people have tried to solve, but that have left those same people scrambling for answers.


2. Big Problems Aren't Often Solved By Existing Experts. Oftentimes, the old guard in an industry has been doing things one way for so long that they've put on blinders that prevent them from seeing new possibilities.


3. Existing Experts Can Be Part of the Problem. Especially in bleeding industries, experts can be more concerned with maintaining the status quo that won them their expert status... rather than innovating.


4. It Takes a New Pair of Eyes to Spot the Pain. My brother finally helped me see that purple parachute pants in the mid-90s weren't a good idea. Similarly, in business it's often the guy on the outside that sees the problem.


5. Experts Won't Risk Their Expert Status to Find a Solution. That job goes to someone whose risk-reward ratio is different; someone who stands to gain more than they might lose by innovating.


That someone is often a newbie - a person looking at the problem with a fresh pair of eyes. That someone... is perhaps you!


Last Thought: The above is more the cycle of innovation than a story of experts having bad intentions (which isn't usually the case). Marching forward and solving big problems always requires new voices in the conversation.

Posted originally by on Linked In.

Founder and CEO, Avanoo






Tuesday, December 22, 2015

Phytoremediation potential of kenaf--Bridgeton Westlake Landfills

MOhemp Energy is exploring the Legal to grow Kenaf Plant for the Westlake and Bridgeton Landfills Natural Remediation Project.  

Here is information from a past study:
Phytoremediation potential of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) grown in different soil textures and cadmium concentrations

This study investigated effect of soil textures and cadmium (Cd) concentrations on the growth, fibre yields and Cd absorption of kenaf. 

Screen-house experiment was conducted in the University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (UNAAB), Ogun State, Nigeria. Top soils were collected from Murtala Victoria Botanical Garden, Epe, Lagos State, Nigeria and UNAAB Teaching and Research Farm. 


  • Ten-litre plastic pots were filled with 10 kg soil. Experimental design was a 2 × 5 factorial in RCBD replicated three times.
  • Two soil textures and five levels of Cd concentration (as Cadmium nitrate): 0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5 and 6.0 mgCd/kg soil. Growth and yield parameters were collected. 
  • Cd content of plants and soils were determined using AAS and analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA and correlation. UNAAB soil had pH of 6.3 with sandy loam texture while Epe soil had pH and texture of 5.3 and sand respectively. 
  • Control had significantly (P<0.05) higher plant height, stem girth, bast and core yields while 6.0 mg/kg had the least in the two soils. 
  • The more the concentration of Cd applied, the higher was the absorption by kenaf in the two soils. 
  • Kenaf planted in Epe soil had better absorption than UNAAB soil. 
  • There was significant (p < 0.01) positive correlation between Cd applied and Cd absorbed by kenaf. 
  • Key words: Phytoremediation by kenaf, soil textures, cadmium concentrations. 
  • Remediation by conventional technologies is very expensive and it has been estimated that the cost of conventional remediating heavy metal-contaminated sites in the USA alone would exceed $7 billion (Salt et al., 1995)
The best type of soil for kenaf production is a well-drained sandy loam soil; sand soil is not recommended for kenaf production as plant growing in such soil bloom rather early, without attaining sufficient height; consequently low yields are obtained from such soil (Dempsey, 1975). The higher the concentration of Cd applied, the more was the Cd absorption by kenaf in UNAAB and Epe soils (Table 3). In the two soils, kenaf planted in 6.0 mgCd/kg soil had significantly (p <0.05) highest Cd absorption followed by kenaf planted in 4.5 mgCd/kg soil, 30 mgCd/kg soil, 1.5 mgCd/kgsoil and control respectively. This might probably be due to the amount of metal in the soil. ZhenGuo et al. (2002) and Arthur et al. (2003) reported that phytoextraction and uptake of heavy metal is enhanced by its availability and concentration in the soil. Comparing the Cd absorption of kenaf planted in UNAAB and Epe soils, the kenaf in Epe soil had better absorption than the one in UNAAB soil at every concentration level. With reference to 6.0 mgCd/kg soil, kenaf planted in UNAAB soil absorbed more than the one planted in Epe soil by 2.2%. However, bioavailability index has been used to demonstrate the ability of plants to accumulate heavy metals (Rotkittikhun et al., 2006). Epe soil also had higher bioavailability index than UNAAB soil at every concentration level (Table 3). The difference in pH (UNAAB soil 6.3 and Epe soil 5.3) and soils textures might responsible for better absorption of kenaf in Epe soil. Arthur et al. (2003) similarly observed that mobility and bioavailability of metals for plant uptake is enhanced at lower soil pH. Cd levels of UNAAB and Epe soils after harvesting decreased compared to the applied concentrations before planting (Table 4). The higher the concentration of Cd applied to the soils before planting, the more was the content in the soil after harvesting with 6.0 mgCd/kg soil had significantly (p < 0.05) highest level of Cd followed by 4.5 mgCd/kg soil, 3.0 mgCd/kg soil, 1.5 mgCd/kg soil and control respectively in the two soils. Pearson correlation analysis established that Cd concentration applied was positively correlated with Cd absorbed by kenaf (r = 0.99, p < 0.01 in UNAAB soil; r = 1.00, p < 0.01 in Epe soil) and with residual Cd in the soils after harvesting (r = 0.99, p < 0.01 in UNAAB soil; r = 0.96, p < 0.01 in Epe soil). CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Growth and yield parameters of kenaf reduced with increased in cadmium concentrations. Ability of kenaf to absorb cadmium varied with soil texture, soil pH, and concentration of cadmium in the soil. Further research could also be carried out on other varieties of kenaf at much higher concentrations of cadmium and at varying soil pH. 



 

Saturday, December 19, 2015

Phytoremediation Process-Uranium Tailings

Phytoremediation Process Uranium Tailings

short video demonstration









Poem Soil Remediation Phytoremediation Natural


Imagine for a moment,
a perfect world.

A perfect world of remediation in which
there was no need for regulatory push,
the PRPs always take the high ground
to clean up sites voluntarily,
and they do not litigate to delay;

A perfect world of remediation in which
the sources can always be found with certainty,
and the contaminant plumes
always self remediate intrinsically
or the presumptive remedy was
indeed the best technology for the site;

A perfect world of remediation in which
the stakeholders' concerns were
always addressed early and often,
there were economies of scale up,
there was no Valley of Death
and the investors always made enough profits.

Now, wake up,
stop imagining
and look around carefully
remembering that imagining
an ideal world is just an escape,
from the real world.

But, before you despair,
ask yourself how and act to
transform the real world
into the one you just imagined.

 http://www.nap.edu/read/5781/chapter/1#xiii < Source of Poem.


Phytoremediation Research Web Links





Phytoremediation

Definitions

  • Phytoremediation - "The application of plant-controlled interactions with groundwater and organic and inorganic molecules at contaminated sites to achieve site-specific remedial goals." - Landmeyer, 2011


  • Phytoremediation - "Phytoremediation is the use of green plants to remove pollutants from the environment or render them harmless ... 'Green' technology uses plants to 'vacuum' heavy metals from the soil through the roots ... While acting as vacuum cleaners, the unique plants must be able to tolerate and survive high levels of heavy metals in soils." - Becker, 2000

  • Phytoremediation - "Phytoremediation uses plants to clean up pollution in the environment. Plants can help clean up many kinds of pollution including metals, pesticides, explosives, and oil. The plants also help prevent wind, rain, and groundwater from carrying pollution away from sites to other areas. Phytoremediation works best at sites with low to medium amounts of pollution. Plants remove harmful chemicals from the ground when their roots take in water and nutrients from polluted soil, streams, and groundwater ... Once inside the plant, chemicals can be stored in the roots, stems, or leaves; changed into less harmful chemicals within the plant; or changed into gases that are released into the air as the plant transpires (breathes)." - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001

  • Phytoremediation - "Phytoremediation is the direct use of green plants and their associated microorganisms to stabilize or reduce contamination in soils, sludges, sediments, surface water, or ground water ... Sites with low concentrations of contaminants over large cleanup areas and at shallow depths present especially favorable conditions for phytoremediation." - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011

  • Phytoremediation - "Phytoremediation is the use of vegetation for in situ treatment of contaminated soils, sediments, and water. It is best applied at sites with shallow contamination of organic, nutrient, or metal pollutants ... Phytoremediation is an emerging technology for contaminated sites that is attractive due to its low cost and versatility." - Schnoor, 1997

  • Phytoremediation - "Remediation of contaminated soil in situ using vegetation ... Phytoremediation is carried out by growing plants that hyperaccumulate metals in the contaminated soil." - National Research Council, 1997

USGS Phytoremediation Information

More Phytoremediation Information

References

Becker, H., 2000, Phytoremediation--Using plants to clean up soils: Agricultural Research v. 48, no. 6.
National Research Council, 1997, Innovations in ground water and soil cleanup--From concept to commercialization: Washington, D.C., National Academies Press, 310 p.
Schnoor, J.L., 1997, Phytoremediation: Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center Technology Evaluation Report TE-98-01.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2001, A citizen's guide to phytoremediation: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Technology Innovation Office.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011, Using phytoremediation to clean up sites: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, access date June 2, 2011.

Disclaimer: The definitions on this page are provided for information purposes only, and do not indicate endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Friday, December 18, 2015

National Hemp Association Dec Newsletter

December 2015                        Hemp NewsVol. 2  No. 12
Dear MOhemp,
What do you consider the biggest obstacle to the future success of the American hemp industry? Is it ignorance around hemp and its myriad uses? The challenge of rebuilding a industry that was dismantled after World War II? How about that farmers and businesses can't freely import seeds from outside the U.S.?
The National Hemp Association sees all these challenges as ones we most overcome. That's why we are making2016 the year to make hemp fully legal at the Federal level. We are ready and have the team to make this happen. However, we need your help. If you want to see hemp removed from the Controlled Substances Act, pleasedonate now to the Federal Campaign. We have a lot to get done during December in preparation for campaign activities that will happen during the crucial first quarter of 2016.
Money is starting to flow in, and we'd like to thank the wonderful folks at Bluebird Botanicals for being a lead sponsor of our   (See photo with Bluebird founder Brandon Beatty (above right) with NHA Communications Director Neshama Abraham and I). We appreciate everyone's support. Hemp is such a sustainable crop. On the heels of the Climate Talks in Paris, it's even more imperative that we bring back industrial hemp as a major American crop for our environment, health, and a source of thousands of U.S. jobs. 
 
Zev Paiss, Executive Director
National Hemp Association
Sampling of Recent Hemp News
It's Time to Make Hemp Fully Legal
at the Federal Level
Help us pass the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2015 to remove hemp from the Controlled Substances Act and allow for unrestricted importation of viable seeds, transportation of hemp in all forms across state lines, and eliminate the confusion around hemp oil extracts. Read the campaign description. 

Please donate to the Federal Campaign. December funds are needed now so we can hit the ground running in January 2016. Contact us to get involved in your area at 303-413-8066 or email us.
In January 2016 a group of dedicated hempsters will begin a 100,000 mile trip across the U.S. on a nationwide grassroots campaign to promote hemp and the passage of the Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2015.
 
NHA is partnering with the Hemp Road Trip to educate Americans about the crop and end the federal prohibition on hemp. The hemp bus will visit key states as part of our Federal Campaign. Donate to the NHA Federal Campaign and indicate you are supporting the Hemp Road Trip. Learn more at their Facebook page.

The National Hemp Association and Colorado Hemp Company would like your participation in the third annual NoCo Hemp Expo,
April 1-2, 2016. Focused on hemp education worldwide, we invite you to join us as we unveil the the benefits of industrial and nutritional hemp at NoCo3. Find out how you can help move this industry forward by securing your spot at the largest hemp-centric trade show in North America. Sponsor and vendor early-bird savings available now through December 31. Visit their website for more information. NHA is a proud sponsor of the Expo.
 
Reserve your space - Early Bird Specials through December 31, 2015.  Register Here or Become a Sponsor 
 Did You Know?
When the Marijuana Tax of 1937 was instituted, industrial hemp was primarily replaced in textiles and clothing by cotton and polyester. Cotton needs extensive amounts of pesticides, creating pollution that can harm humans, animals, and other plants. By contrast, hemp grows in most climates without pesticides and herbicides, naturally withstanding common insects. Hemp is a highly sustainable crop which also rebuilds the soil and pulls carbon from the atmosphere.    
New Hemp Economics
 
Congratulations 
for publishing the first issue of this publication.  An annual
 subscription  
includes four quarterly reports (available online and mailed).  NHA folks can receive a 30% discount thru 1/10/16use coupon code  
"hbjholidaymagic"
Our Gold Business Members
    
   
    

Our Silver Business Members
                                     
 

Share This

Organization and Social Sites